Topic summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos2,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Prices results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,276 hits. Analysis detected 6,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,821 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,602 of 16,436 topics). This Drug Prices is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Drug Prices
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,821
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.3%16.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos