Topic summary
86%1 analyzed article/video856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drought Mitigation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,227 of 16,562 topics). This Drought Mitigation is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Drought Mitigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos