Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donor Influence In Schools results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 6,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,388 of 15,769 topics). This Donor Influence In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Donor Influence In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 6,838
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos