Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diseases results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,995 of 15,776 topics). This Diseases is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Diseases
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠50%Diseases (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos