Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Director Retrospective results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 1,774 hits. Analysis detected 7,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,607 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,460 topics). This Director Retrospective is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Director Retrospective
Topic details
Total words: 5,607
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos