Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomatic Efforts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 480 hits. Analysis detected 3,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,659 of 15,447 topics). This Diplomatic Efforts is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Diplomatic Efforts
Topic details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos