Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Detox results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 235 hits . Analysis detected 1,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,418 of 16,562 topics). This Digital Detox is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Digital Detox
Topic details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst