Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simone McCandless results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 235 hits . Analysis detected 1,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,922 of 6,244 authors). This Simone McCandless is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Simone McCandless
Author details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst