Missourians turn to 'digital detox' experiences to reconnect beyond screens 43%

By Simone McCandless0%

5/30/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 473 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,609 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

Some people are now paying for something they used to get for free: time away from their phones. 
It is part of an emerging consumer behavior trend known as "digital detox," where people attend retreats, programs or experiences that encourage them to unplug from screens and reconnect with the world around them. 
Now, that trend is reaching Missouri. 
St. 
Louis health and wellness coach Jess Thenhaus is introducing that trend to Missourians by creating an outdoor digital detox retreat called Go Play Outside. 
The retreat runs for five weeks on Sundays, and participants meet at a different park for an hour and a half. 
Thenhaus has worked in wellness coaching for five years. 
This is her second year running the retreat, but she said the idea became more urgent after the pandemic. 
"After the pandemic, this kind of realization we're so disconnected led me to pivot back into health and wellness," Thenhaus said. 
"People really need to be connected to nature because the world is moving so fast, and we are very disconnected." 
The retreat's name came from a childhood memory. 
"I had this idea like, 'Gosh, I just need my mom to ground me,'" Thenhaus said. 
"And I remember as kid, my mom being like, 'Go play outside. 
Turn that off and go get outside.' 
And so that really was the inspiration." 
Hexagon Alley has a similar concept. 
The Columbia business encourages face-to-face interactions with choices from over 750 board games. 
The business even offers memberships. 
James Long, the assistant general manager of Hexagon Alley, said its business model was centered on the idea of pushing people to put their phones down. 
"A lot of the time, where the digital age is so powerful and people are on their phones and everyone has really bad screen time and like all that kind of stuff, to have something where you can meet face-to-face and focus on the in-person interaction, that was the idea," Long said. 
Psychologist Gary Lembke said accountability is needed today because of how difficult it is to unplug. 
"Anytime we get some feedback, it triggers serotonin and dopamine where we get an adrenaline rush," Lembke said. 
And while devices might have negative repercussions, he said the goal is to not reject technology altogether. 
"Social media can be a very effective tool," Lembke said. 
"It's what we do with it and how we use it." 
Thenhaus said participants often leave surprised by how much a simple break from screens can affect them. 
"Some of the things that people have said is that I didn't realize that something so simple could have such a big impact," Thenhaus said. 
Aa digital detox grows, Thenhaus said the trend is less about giving something and more about getting something back. 
Copyright 2026 KBIA 91.3 FM 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.5%Simone McCandless: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Simone McCandless: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 1.3%Simone McCandless: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Simone McCandless: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 15.6%Simone McCandless: 6.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect15.6%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Simone McCandless: 3.3%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias13.3%This article: 4.2%Simone McCandless: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 11.0%Simone McCandless: 5.5%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Simone McCandless: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Simone McCandless: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Simone McCandless: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.8%Simone McCandless: 4.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority10.8%This article: 2.3%Simone McCandless: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.0%Simone McCandless: 12.4%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization11.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 4.2%Simone McCandless: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question4.2%This article: 12.3%Simone McCandless: 4.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.3%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.2%Simone McCandless: 11.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal19.2%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Simone McCandless: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.2%Simone McCandless: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Simone McCandless: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 33.4%Simone McCandless: 8.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…33.4%

473 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers74%attributed speech125writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHexagon Alley • 13 words • 100.0% coverageHexagon Alley • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJames Long • 26 words • 100.0% coverageJames Long • 52 words • 100.0% coverageGary Lembke • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGary Lembke • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGary Lembke • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGary Lembke • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGary Lembke • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJess Thenhaus • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Long

100%flagged-word coverage
78 attributed words22% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +83.2 ptsWriter: 16.8%James Long: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.