Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dietary Deficiencies results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 500 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,884 of 16,483 topics). This Dietary Deficiencies is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Dietary Deficiencies
Topic details
Total words: 1,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos