Topic summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit History results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 560 faulty-reasoning hits from 705 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,127 of 16,562 topics). This Detroit History is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Detroit History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 705
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles705 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.3%3.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos