Topic summary
42% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Design results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,829 hits . Analysis detected 15,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,244 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,508 of 16,011 topics). This Design is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Design
Topic details
Total words: 19,244
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst