Topic summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Party Politics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,697 hits . Analysis detected 16,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,883 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,057 of 16,562 topics). This Democratic Party Politics is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Democratic Party Politics
Topic details
Total words: 12,883
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst