Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos3,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense & Military results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,215 hits. Analysis detected 11,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,274 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,319 of 16,562 topics). This Defense & Military is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Defense & Military
Topic details
Total words: 12,274
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos