Author summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter D. Feaver results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 4,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,363 of 6,629 authors). This Peter D. Feaver is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Peter D. Feaver
Author details
Total words: 5,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst