Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defamation Law results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,347 hits. Analysis detected 12,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,396 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,097 of 16,110 topics). This Defamation Law is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Defamation Law
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,396
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos