Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Dive results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 2,903 hits . Analysis detected 17,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,542 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,412 of 15,946 topics). This Deep Dive is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Deep Dive
Topic details
Total words: 16,542
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst