Topic summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos1,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Death Penalty Abolition results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,243 hits. Analysis detected 6,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,816 of 23,992 topics). This Death Penalty Abolition is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Death Penalty Abolition
Topic details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos