Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Valenzuela results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 710 hits . Analysis detected 4,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,678 of 9,307 authors). This Victoria Valenzuela is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Victoria Valenzuela
Author details
Total words: 5,720
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst