BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 847 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.3% and a BS Rank of 55% (13,574 of 30,190 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the article peer group.

Tennessee’s Riverbend Maximum Security Prison is the place where death row inmates go to be executed. 
Driving there was a surreal experience, partly because I had only recently reentered the free world after being in prison for 10 years. 
But today I had a purpose: I was there to protest state-sanctioned murder . 
The state doesn’t hide it—when a person is killed on death row, their death certificate lists the cause of death as “homicide.” 
Some inmates are surprised to learn that Tennessee Gov. 
Bill Lee allows these executions to take place, especially since his campaign often referenced his work with prison ministry Men of Valor, which advocates for forgiveness and redemption. 
In fact, those on death row have invited the governor to come pray with them prior to an execution. 
The invitation was ignored. 
At Riverbend, I met veteran death row protesters like Abe Bonowitz, co-founder of Death Penalty Action . 
Advocates like Bonowitz are often seen standing vigil outside the prison in a fenced area reserved for those against death row, clearly separated from those in favor of it. 
Many death row vigil organizers have spent time with the condemned, whether as educators, pastors, spiritual advisers, or volunteers. 
For Graham Reside, an ethics professor at the Vanderbilt University Divinity School and executive director of the Cal Turner Program for Moral Leadership in the Professions, some death row inmates are his students. 
“I want to talk to the guys on the inside,” Reside said in an interview with The Tennessean . 
“I’m not saying they’re experts, but they’ve got something to teach me. 
And so, we’re talking about executing one of our teachers.” 
Once volunteers have spent time with those on death row, they realize the person being executed is often not the same person who committed the crime. 
Some say that executing a rehabilitated person years after the crime occurred is “legalized lynching.” 
This term holds weight especially when considering Tennessee’s legacy of lynching and racial discrimination . 
In 2023, Tennessee state Rep. 
Paul Sherrell even publicly suggested adding “hanging by a tree” to the state’s execution methods. 
Riverbend death row vigils usually gather around 30 people, whereas the area reserved for death penalty supporters rarely gather more than two. 
Andrew Krinks, an author, teacher, and prison volunteer, has attended many vigils prior to and during executions, and described being feet away from looming death as “very powerful.” 
“That passage from life to death is so sacred, so tragic, so ultimate,” said Krinks. 
“Knowing that people are accompanying them, even if they are only in spirit, can be an affirmation that makes life meaningful one more time before death arrives.” 
David Bass, another volunteer, has been participating in these vigils for over 10 years. 
Bass grew up in conservative southern Alabama and was an “avid supporter of the death penalty” until he was inspired to visit death row inmates by pastor and longtime death penalty abolitionist Joe Ingle. 
That first visit lasted three hours. 
“My life was never to be the same,” he said. 
One death row inmate, Terry King, became his best friend. 
According to Bass, he visited King almost 225 times. 
“I eventually started to visit Terry every week. 
Soon, both my daughters were visiting. 
Terry became a member of our family, even speaking at one of my daughter’s weddings by phone,” Bass said. 
“In visiting with Terry, it was only natural for me to meet his friends. 
I got to know many of them well. 
They became my friends as well.” 
Tennessee’s support for the death penalty has only gotten more severe. 
In the last year, the legislature has added new justifications to execute that don’t include being found guilty of murder. 
Lee, as well as gubernatorial candidates like Sen. 
Marsha Blackburn, are all in support of continuing the kinds of executions that have been banned in 23 states. 
Bass’s experience is one many of us have witnessed while incarcerated. 
A volunteer ventures beyond the concrete walls and razor wire and discovers a kinship with those who have been discarded from society, but still have arms stretched wide for redemption and hope. 
The people inside are not the monsters; they are real human beings who cry, love, and feel. 
Many carry remorse and sorrow, understand the harm they’ve caused, and pray that the changes they have made can be seen and recognized. 
When seen through this lens, how can you still stomach sending someone to a death chamber? 
The Right to Write (R2W) project is an editorial initiative where Prism works with incarcerated writers to share their reporting and perspectives across our verticals and coverage areas. 
Learn more about R2W and how to pitch here . 
Rikki Li, Lead Editor 
Lara Witt, Top Editor 
Stephanie Harris, Copy Editor 
Tennessee death row abolitionists organize vigils to protest state-sanctioned murder is a story from Prism , a BIPOC-led nonprofit news outlet that centers the people, places, and issues currently underreported by national media. 
Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to support our work today. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Jeff Noland: 2.5%Prism: 3.9%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Jeff Noland: 3.1%Prism: 2.7%Availability Heuristic9.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Jeff Noland: 8.2%Prism: 4.1%Framing Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Jeff Noland: 2.7%Prism: 1.3%Optimism Bias10.9%This article: 1.3%Jeff Noland: 0.3%Prism: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.3%This article: 10.9%Jeff Noland: 4.2%Prism: 5.5%Negativity Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Jeff Noland: 2.8%Prism: 0.8%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Jeff Noland: 4.8%Prism: 0.5%Halo Effect11.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Jeff Noland: 0.7%Prism: 0.5%Recency Bias2.8%This article: 2.0%Jeff Noland: 0.5%Prism: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeff Noland: 0.8%Prism: 0.3%Ad Hominem3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Jeff Noland: 1.0%Prism: 1.7%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 2.6%Jeff Noland: 0.6%Prism: 1.2%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 1.8%Jeff Noland: 0.4%Prism: 1.4%Slippery Slope1.8%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%Jeff Noland: 7.0%Prism: 4.1%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.2%Jeff Noland: 1.2%Prism: 0.3%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 18.9%Jeff Noland: 16.9%Prism: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion18.9%This article: 1.2%Jeff Noland: 0.8%Prism: 0.7%Begging the Question1.2%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.0%Jeff Noland: 5.0%Prism: 2.6%Anecdotal13.0%This article: 2.0%Jeff Noland: 0.5%Prism: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.4%Jeff Noland: 0.4%Prism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.4%Prism: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.0%Jeff Noland: 5.9%Prism: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice10.0%This article: 3.1%Jeff Noland: 3.2%Prism: 1.7%Indoctrination3.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 4.5%Prism: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Noland: 0.0%Prism: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Jeff Noland: 2.2%Prism: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

847 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers43%attributed speech480writer words
Selected voice

Bill Lee

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words7.6% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+88.1 ptsWriter: 11.9%Bill Lee: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Bill Lee: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.