Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating Apps results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 3,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,775 of 16,504 topics). This Dating Apps is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Dating Apps
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,024
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos