Mashable67%

Your friends can now add to your Hinge profile 40%

7/15/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 530 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (13,131 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the article peer group.

If you've been on a dating app, your friend has likely stolen your phone to swipe for you or change your profile. 
Now, a new Hinge feature lets them officially do the latter. 
Today, Hinge launches Friend's Take, a feature where users can invite their loved ones to add a text prompt, voice note, or image to users' profiles. 
The point is for your friends (or co-worker, family members - whomever) to reflect and share their thoughts about you that potential matches can see. 
All your Hinge questions, answered 
According to internal Hinge data, 79 percent of users rely on friends and family for advice about their dating lives. 
Now, there's a way for them to literally add their opinion to daters' profiles. 
"Until now, there hasn't been an easy way for the people who know you best to be part of creating your Hinge profile," Hinge's chief product and technology officer, Ben Celebicic, said in a press release shared with Mashable. 
"Friend's Take makes room for those who are always alongside you as you date and gives potential matches a richer, more authentic sense of who someone is before they meet." 
Users can send a unique link to anyone to add a Friend's Take. 
No Hinge account is required on the other person's end, but they do have up to 72 hours to add their take before the link expires (or, until up to 10 people add a take). 
The user can then pick and choose which takes to add to their profile, and have up to three displayed at one time. 
In a preview of Friend's Take attended by Mashable, Hinge representatives discussed how a dater's friends may be able to speak to their positive qualities better than the person themselves. 
In response to a question of whether someone can technically add their own take, pretending to be someone else, they said yes. 
(Though, like any dating profile fakery, the buck would stop when you meet someone IRL and realize their profile wasn't truly representative of them.) 
"Your friends see you clearly, often more clearly than you see yourself," Hinge's lead relationship scientist, Logan Ury, said in the press release. 
"They know the qualities you'd never think to mention, like 'She's the sweetest dog mom' or 'He'd never admit this, but he's the person everyone calls in a crisis.'" 
Hinge is introducing Friend's Take shortly after the official launch of the purple heartbeat feature, Signals , a literal signal of "thoughtful" dating behavior of the app. 
Hinge also recently released Date Ideas to make planning a meetup easier. 
Friend's Take launches globally today, excluding India. 
How to add a Friend's Take to your Hinge profile 
Tap to add a "Friend's Take" in the Edit Profile section of your Hinge account 
Send the link to whomever you want to add a Take to your profile. 
Your loved one adds a text, video, or photo response. 
They have 72 hours to do so before the link expires, or until up to 10 people submit one. 
Review the takes and choose up to three to add to your profile at one time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Mashable: 2.1%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Mashable: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 5.7%Mashable: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 4.5%Mashable: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.5%This article: 4.3%Mashable: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 4.3%Mashable: 5.2%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.1%Mashable: 0.5%Status Quo Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.9%Mashable: 4.2%Optimism Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Mashable: 5.3%Negativity Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Mashable: 0.8%In-Group Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 25.8%Mashable: 4.1%Halo Effect25.8%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.5%Mashable: 3.2%Appeal to Authority15.5%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.6%Mashable: 0.5%Slippery Slope6.6%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Mashable: 5.1%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Mashable: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.6%Mashable: 0.2%Composition/Division2.6%This article: 11.1%Mashable: 2.2%Anecdotal11.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.4%Mashable: 1.2%Unattributed Quote9.4%This article: 11.7%Mashable: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection11.7%This article: 14.9%Mashable: 10.3%Biased Writer Voice14.9%This article: 4.7%Mashable: 2.5%Indoctrination4.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 21.5%Mashable: 16.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…21.5%

530 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech409writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageBen Celebicic • 39 words • 100.0% coverageBen Celebicic • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLogan Ury • 23 words • 100.0% coverageLogan Ury • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ben Celebicic

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words57% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+56.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ben Celebicic: 56.5%56.5%Biased Writer Voice+31.5 ptsWriter: 12.0%Ben Celebicic: 43.5%43.5%Attempt to Sell a Product -27.9 ptsWriter: 27.9%Ben Celebicic: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Ben Celebicic: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Ben Celebicic: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.