Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Celebicic results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 78.3% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 405 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Celebicic is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Ben Celebicic
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
35.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 78.3%78.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 78.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos