Keyword summary
44%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Friend's Take results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 1,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,200 of 37,536 keywords). This Friend's Take is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Friend's Take
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Friend's Take (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos