Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Protection results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 5,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,280 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,310 of 16,562 topics). This Data Protection is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Data Protection
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,280
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos