This is how you stop data trackers from sucking up your health data 27%

By Tomas Apodaca0% Colin Lecher0%

6/17/2025, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 766 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,059 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the article peer group.

In April, The Markup and CalMatters found that Covered California, the state of California’s healthcare exchange, was sending the personal health information of its users to LinkedIn. 
The news triggered a class-action lawsuit and questions from federal lawmakers. 
In June, a Markup investigation further revealed that exchanges maintained by four other states have also leaked visitors’ sensitive health data. 
Readers have asked: Is there anything I can do to stop my information from being leaked this way? 
The answer is yes. 
The trackers we found on health exchanges are extremely common and are used by the world’s most popular websites. 
We’ve found them on websites people use to prepare for college, do their taxes, get a mortgage, or report a mental health crisis. 
Good news is, you can block many, if not all of these trackers with just a few steps. 
What’s happening with our health data? 
The owners of the health exchange websites use services provided by tech companies like LinkedIn, Google and Snapchat to track user activity and to target advertising. 
To make this possible, website owners install and configure code provided by the tech companies on their pages. 
This code is called a “tracker.” 
When you load a page, the tracker code runs, collecting data and sending it to the tech companies’ servers. 
This data can be anything from a profile of the device and browser you’re using to every word you type into a form. 
The tracker can also read and write cookies, which can follow you across multiple websites. 
How can I protect my data from these trackers? 
Because the data is being collected and sent by your browser, you can exercise some control over it. 
Here are the options we’ve tested that have successfully blocked the trackers: 
1. 
Change your settings to block more trackers 
Some browsers block many trackers by default, and are capable of blocking more. 
* If you’re using Safari, using “Advanced Tracking and Fingerprinting Protection” will block the trackers we found. 
* In desktop Firefox, upping your “Enhanced Tracking Protection” level from “Standard” to “Strict” will do the trick. 
* In Chrome and other browsers, blocking third-party cookies won’t stop the trackers from sending your data, but it will make it harder to link that data to you. 
2. 
Install a privacy-protecting browser extension 
If you’re using a desktop browser, one straightforward solution is to install a privacy-protecting browser extension. 
We tested Privacy Badger and uBlock Origin Lite and confirmed that they both blocked the trackers from LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Google that we examined in our stories. 
3. 
Switch to a new browser 
Chrome and Safari, the browsers most people use, don’t stop all the trackers we found from sharing your data out of the box. 
If you don’t want to change your settings as suggested above, installing a new, privacy-focused browser is what we recommend. 
In our tests, the Brave and DuckDuckGo browsers blocked the trackers we profiled. 
(Full disclosure: DuckDuckGo has donated to The Markup.) 
What doesn’t work to block these trackers? 
Using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) will not block these trackers. 
VPN services are handy for obscuring your location, which is a key detail that data brokers use to identify individuals. 
Unfortunately a VPN won’t stop the trackers from reading and writing cookies and sharing details about your device, browser, and activity on the site. 
Also, VPNs can have their own issues with data sharing. 
Browsing in “private” or “incognito” mode will not block these trackers. 
Using these modes will stop cookies from tracking you to other sites, but won’t protect you from having your location, device, browser and activity shared. 
How else can I protect my personal data? 
The steps we’ve recommended above go a long way towards allowing you to choose when and with whom you share your private information while you’re getting things done on the web. 
But a browser is not the only place your data is being harvested; tracking is everywhere from video game consoles to smart TVs. 
You can check out The Markup’s Gentle January series for bite-sized measures to shore up your defenses, and follow these guides to protect your data in multiple different places: 
* How Do I Prepare My Phone for a Protest? 
* Use Our Game Safety Buddy to Protect Your Kids and Yourself on Gaming Consoles 
* Your Smart TV Knows What You’re Watching 
* How Do I Protect My Privacy If I’m Seeking an Abortion? 
* Without a Trace: How to Take Your Phone Off the Grid 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Tomas Apodaca: 0.6%The Markup: 2.2%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Tomas Apodaca: 3.2%The Markup: 2.8%Availability Heuristic12.1%This article: 5.5%Tomas Apodaca: 0.5%The Markup: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Tomas Apodaca: 2.8%The Markup: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias8.0%This article: 6.3%Tomas Apodaca: 2.8%The Markup: 3.2%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 3.3%Tomas Apodaca: 2.1%The Markup: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.3%This article: 3.5%Tomas Apodaca: 0.4%The Markup: 0.3%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Tomas Apodaca: 2.6%The Markup: 2.1%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 3.1%Tomas Apodaca: 0.7%The Markup: 0.7%Pessimism Bias3.1%This article: 17.8%Tomas Apodaca: 7.4%The Markup: 6.5%Negativity Bias17.8%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.3%The Markup: 2.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Tomas Apodaca: 1.7%The Markup: 1.1%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.1%The Markup: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.6%The Markup: 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.8%Tomas Apodaca: 5.8%The Markup: 3.8%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 4.6%Tomas Apodaca: 1.0%The Markup: 1.3%False Dilemma4.6%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.4%Tomas Apodaca: 3.7%The Markup: 3.9%Hasty Generalization12.4%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.8%Tomas Apodaca: 0.3%The Markup: 0.4%Bandwagon3.8%This article: 7.6%Tomas Apodaca: 0.9%The Markup: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 2.3%Tomas Apodaca: 0.2%The Markup: 0.5%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 3.9%Tomas Apodaca: 0.3%The Markup: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.4%The Markup: 3.0%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.5%Tomas Apodaca: 2.0%The Markup: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.5%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.5%The Markup: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Tomas Apodaca: 0.4%The Markup: 0.6%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 2.3%Tomas Apodaca: 1.2%The Markup: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 16.6%Tomas Apodaca: 1.5%The Markup: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice16.6%This article: 6.5%Tomas Apodaca: 6.5%The Markup: 1.2%Indoctrination6.5%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tomas Apodaca: 0.0%The Markup: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Tomas Apodaca: 2.3%The Markup: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.2%

766 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech632writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageThe Markup • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThe Markup • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageThe Markup • 29 words • 100.0% coverageThe Markup • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThe Markup • 15 words • 100.0% coverageThe Markup • 8 words • 0.0% coverageThe Markup • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThe Markup • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Markup

93%flagged-word coverage
134 attributed words100% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +33.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%The Markup: 41.8%41.8%Biased Writer Voice+23.3 ptsWriter: 12.5%The Markup: 35.8%35.8%Indoctrination-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%The Markup: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%The Markup: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%The Markup: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.