Topic summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Analysis results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,023 hits. Analysis detected 9,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,086 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,978 of 16,562 topics). This Data Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Data Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,086
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos