Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Caine results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 4,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,664 of 15,769 topics). This Dan Caine is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Dan Caine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,792
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.0%23.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.6%16.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.1%9.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.1%7.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos