Topic summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclospora Outbreak results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 4,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,240 of 16,562 topics). This Cyclospora Outbreak is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Cyclospora Outbreak
Topic details
Total words: 3,372
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos