Author summary
71%1 analyzed article/video278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Heffernan results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Red Herring, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 919 faulty-reasoning hits from 834 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (845 of 6,244 authors). This Brian Heffernan is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Brian Heffernan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Brian Heffernan (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 834
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles834 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.6%8.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.7%6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.6%15.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Red Herring: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Special Pleading: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos