Topic summary
50% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Currency results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 582 hits . Analysis detected 6,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,870 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,802 of 16,562 topics). This Currency is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Currency
Topic details
Total words: 7,870
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst