Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curiosities results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,675 hits. Analysis detected 6,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,098 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,033 of 16,562 topics). This Curiosities is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Curiosities
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,098
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos