Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrencies results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 1,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,677 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,023 of 16,562 topics). This Cryptocurrencies is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Cryptocurrencies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,677
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos