Topic summary
93%4 analyzed articles/videos1,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crime Reduction results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 756 hits. Analysis detected 8,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,827 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,020 of 16,562 topics). This Crime Reduction is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Crime Reduction

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate