Topic summary
52% 20 analyzed articles/videos 23,940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Covid 19 Pandemic results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 8,227 hits . Analysis detected 74,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 96,992 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (19,230 of 23,187 topics). This Covid 19 Pandemic is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Covid 19 Pandemic
Topic details
Total words: 96,992
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score20 analyzed articles97K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst