Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Couture results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 872 hits. Analysis detected 4,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Couture is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Couture
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos