Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counterterrorism Strategy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 2,848 hits. Analysis detected 19,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,438 of 15,266 topics). This Counterterrorism Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Counterterrorism Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 18,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos