Topic summary
70% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counter Terrorism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,381 hits . Analysis detected 24,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,030 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,077 of 15,765 topics). This Counter Terrorism is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Counter Terrorism
Topic details
Total words: 20,030
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst