Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cosmochemistry results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,990 of 16,562 topics). This Cosmochemistry is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Cosmochemistry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos