Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corporate Turmoil results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 4,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,875 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Turmoil is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corporate Turmoil
Topic details
Total words: 1,875
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.4%48.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.5%24.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 11.7%11.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 13.1%13.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos