Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Criticism results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,791 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Criticism is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Corporate Criticism
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠78%Corporate Criticism (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 26.3%26.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.3%25.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.7%24.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos