Topic summary
54% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Accountability results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,580 hits . Analysis detected 18,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,921 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,211 of 15,327 topics). This Corporate Accountability is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Corporate Accountability
Topic details
Total words: 12,921
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst