Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coping Strategies results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,470 of 16,562 topics). This Coping Strategies is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Coping Strategies
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠37%Coping Strategies (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos