Author summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bonnie Zucker Ph.D. results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (3,652 of 6,628 authors). This Bonnie Zucker Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Bonnie Zucker Ph.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠45%Bonnie Zucker Ph.D. (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos