Topic summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos1,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contempt Of Court results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 950 hits. Analysis detected 6,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,691 of 16,562 topics). This Contempt Of Court is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Contempt Of Court
Topic details
Total words: 5,772
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos