Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contemplative Practices In Education results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 2,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,531 of 16,562 topics). This Contemplative Practices In Education is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Contemplative Practices In Education
Topic details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos