Topic summary
⁠95%2 analyzed articles/videos575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Advocacy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 4,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,843 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Consumer Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos