Topic summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Constitutional Reform results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,097 hits . Analysis detected 7,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,293 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,490 of 16,562 topics). This Constitutional Reform is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Constitutional Reform
Topic details
Total words: 7,293
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst