Topic summary
⁠41%4 analyzed articles/videos2,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connecticut results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,669 hits. Analysis detected 7,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,646 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (6,950 of 15,447 topics). This Connecticut is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Connecticut
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,646
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.8%21.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos