Topic summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos4,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Maps results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 2,006 hits. Analysis detected 14,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,388 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,976 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Maps is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Congressional Maps
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate